Want this question answered?
Jackson threatened to send federal troops to South Carolina to force them to comply with the law. Jackson did send troops.
Jackson threatened to send federal troops to South Carolina to force them to comply with the law. Jackson did send troops.
Jackson threatened to send federal troops to South Carolina to force them to comply with the law. Jackson did send troops.
President Jackson's commitment to states' rights was challenged during the Nullification Crisis when South Carolina chose to nullify a tariff they believed would not operate in the state's best interest. He threatened to use the military to force the state to comply.
Jackson was enraged. He said to the South Carolina congressman that if the state's leaders disobeyed state laws, he would "hang the first man he got his hands on". after he ran for reelection, he enforced the idea that he would have to force everyone to obey federal laws and the Union was preserved. Resource: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=67
The United States Force Bill was passed by Congress on March 2, 1833 at the behest of President Andrew Jackson. This bill allowed Jackson use any force necessary to suppress obstruction of federal law, use armed forces to protect custom officers and untaxed vessels, and expand the jurisdiction of federal courts to revenue collection cases by the US government. This was all done to drive South Carolina to comply with a set of federal tariffs.
The nullification crisis developed when South Carolina refused to collect and pay to the US government tariff monies. President Jackson displayed the power of the Federal government by using troops to force South Carolina to comply wit the US Constitution which specified how tariffs were part of the duties of the US government. It was a strong message by Jackson.
They can request it of South Carolina - South Carolina may or may not comply. Georgia can suspend your privilege to drive within their state.
Yes, as long as you comply with North Carolina's regulations concerning the move.
It is "comply with" or "conform to" not "comply to." To act in agreement with rules or requests. Definitely comply with
It is "comply with rules" rather than "comply to rules."
The correct phrase is "comply with." It means to adhere to or follow rules, regulations, or instructions.