Want this question answered?
People need to read it more.
Slaves were property and had no rights.
Thomas Jefferson is actually the one who wrote the Declaration of Independence. It was written because the colonies felt King George III was abusing them.
hi
The Chief US Supreme Justice at the time of the Dred Scott decision was Justice Taney. He wrote the majority decision that proclaimed that Blacks in the USA could never be citizens. It was a 7 to 2 decision.
the colonists
People need to read it more.
No one was solely responsible for the Declaration of independence. It was written by several different men, not based one just one mans opinion. A better Question would be "Who influenced the making of the Declaration of independence the most."
What Benjamin Rush did was sign the declaration of independence, to express his opinion to have freedom, liberty and pursuit of happiness
Declaration of Independence is the document that was crucial in changing public opinion to support independence. The document states that all men were created equal.
No. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney is best known for his opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford, (1857), a landmark case that denied slaves citizenship or freedom.Justice Harry Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court for Roe v Wade, (1973).
In my opinion, it's a toss up between: "all men [sic] are born equally free and independent" (George Mason, Virginia Declaration of Rights); and, the people have the right to alter or abolish government.
Justice is an abstraction; it has no opinion about me.
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney asserted no slave or other person of African descent could ever be a United States citizen in the opinion of the Dred Scott v. Sandford, (1857) case. The purpose behind this declaration was his justification for denying slaves the right to sue for their freedom, a relatively common practice in that era.The Dred Scott decision is considered a major catalyst of the American Civil War.
No. The usual thinking is that about one-third of the colonists supported independence, about one-third opposed it, and the other third had no strong opinion on the matter.
A dissenting opinion is written when a justice disagrees with the majority opinion (which carries the force of law). If a justice is writing a dissenting opinion, that means he or she voted with the minority group, and wants to explain the reason why he or she disagrees with the official Opinion of the Court. Dissenting opinions may be cited, but are not enforceable.
A Supreme Court justice may choose to write a concurring opinion when he or she agrees with the majority decision, but wants to add perceptions or legal reasoning not addressed, or not addressed to that justice's satisfaction, in the majority opinion (opinion of the Court).