Lamarck's theory is that an organism can pass traits to their offspring that they have acquired in their lifetime. One example commonly used is that he felt giraffes acquired long necks because of generations of them stretching and trying to reach higher leaves on the tree. He thought that these stretched muscles would be passed down to their offspring. This has been proven wrong because this is not how evolution takes place. If you would cut off the tails of two mice and then breed them their offspring would not have short tails.
Lamarck did. Neodarwinism theorises that species evolve when gene frequencies change, not individual organisms. Larmarkism is true for epigenetic inheritance, favourable and unfavourable characteristics alike.
Jean- Baptiste Lamarck
Fossils or natural selection
Lamarck's theory is that he thought that the long necks from giraffes come from other species of mammals.
Not well supported by the evidence and basically just assertion. Lamarck asserted that acquired characteristics, such as muscles developed during one's lifetime, were heritable. They are not. He also asserted that an organism had a " desire " to evolve. This was also not true.
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck
Lamarck's theory is based on acquired characteristics. In other words if you break your arm your future children will be born with broken arms.
Lamarck did. Neodarwinism theorises that species evolve when gene frequencies change, not individual organisms. Larmarkism is true for epigenetic inheritance, favourable and unfavourable characteristics alike.
That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.
Lamarck thought acquired traits were past on, but he was prover wrong by Darwin and his natural selection idea.
Jean- Baptiste Lamarck
Lamarck proposed that by selective use or disuse of organs, organisms acquired or lost certain traits during their lifetime. Then passed onto offspring-leading to change in species
That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.
That depends on what you mean by 'immediate'. Drastic rates of evolution are possible in many species, where mutations are either relatively very common or where the environment results in harsh selection. But nothing will make one species "immediately" evolve into another in one generation, or even two or ten.
I think you evolve Happiny into Chansey with the oval stone? They have to hold it and level up I think?
Fossils or natural selection
Populations evolve.