Want this question answered?
His invention helped the rejection od spontaneous generation because no one new who he was so no one pay attention to him
Since he obviously helped with the improvement of the microscope, his higher lens quality helped him see a single cell organism. Well, if a single cell organism exists, spontaneous generation is corrupt. He really just proved what Zacharias Jensen did.
Because it helped with the cell theory.
Spontaneous generation was called a mistaken idea by the scientific community because it was based on incorrect assumptions about the origins of living organisms. The discovery of microorganisms and advancements in microbiology showed that living organisms do not arise from non-living matter spontaneously. This led to the rejection of spontaneous generation as a scientific explanation for the origins of life.
Lazzaro Spallanzani, an Italian scientist, constructed an experiment by placing broth in two separate bottles, boiling the broth in both bottles, then sealing one bottle and leaving the other open. Days later, the unsealed bottle was teeming with small living things that he could observe with the newly invented microscope. The sealed bottle showed no signs of life. This excluded spontaneous generation as a viable theory, because if it was true, then there would be life in both bottles.
an agent's job is full with Rejection. The rejection was inevitable.
The rejection and non rejection regions are divided dividing point. critical value. point of no return. rejection value
organ rejection
Load rejection occurs when load is suddenly removed from the generator. The most obvious example of this is the breaker connecting the generator to the power grid opens. This results in a full load rejection. Load pick up means the generator is supplying power to a given load. When a generator comes on line, it will pick up some load that might have been supplied by another generator.
That is progress, you start with a hypothesis, e.g. the moon is made of cheese, then it is tested by experiments to see if it's right. If the experiment says it's wrong, that is something that does not have to be tested again.
there is no rejection from GODs love
there is no rejection from GODs love