Prior to Mendel, scientists thought that the breeding of two living things, each of the same species but with different characteristics, would result in offspring with a blending of these characteristics. For example, if a giraffe with a long neck mated with one with a short neck; the result would be a giraffe with a medium length neck -- and all subsequent matings with short-necked giraffes would result in progressively shorter necks. Because of this, it was conceptually difficult to imagine how random fluctuations of a characteristic could become dominant within that species.
Mendel showed that characteristics could be passed on from only one of the parents. Thus, a long-necked giraffe could mate with a short-necked giraffe and produce children that had (mostly) long necks. Prior to Mendel, it was unknown how living things passed on specific characteristics. He showed that each parent individually contributes the "knowledge"* of specific characteristics, and that the children might have all, some, or none of each parent's characteristics.
* We now know that this "knowledge" is carried in the genes of the DNA, but Mendel had no idea about this.
no
Scientific knowledge changes with the growth of accumulated knowledge, technology, and greater experimentation. With further experimentation and more technology allowing more detailed experimentation, scientific knowledge constantly grows and changes.
Scientific knowledge changes every day. Research is constantly in progress and new information is discovered all the time.
it changes as new evidence is found. it is open to change
It is open to change as new evidence or data is discovered. Scientific knowledge may withstand the test of time if it is true, rather than convenient.
calculation hypothesis time
Scientific knowledge leads to scientific technology, and technology has a huge impact on all aspects of human existence.
it is constantly changeing the world
An understanding of genetics, particularly the work of Gregor Mendel on inheritance patterns, provided crucial evidence for natural selection as the driving force of evolution. This, combined with knowledge of genetic variation and mutations, helped reconcile genetics with the theory of evolution in the modern synthesis, demonstrating how genetic changes accumulate over time to drive evolutionary change.
i nned the answer to
it is open to change as new evidence or data is discovered
i nned the answer to