Want this question answered?
The US Supreme Court ruled that the recount was unconstitutional.
the Supreme Court halted the recount in Florida
The Supreme Court Ended A Recount In Florida That Had Stalled The Election -Novanet
Florida
The Democrats disputed the vote count and appealed to state supreme court which ordered a recount. An appeal was made to to the US Supreme Court which ruled against another recount. There were many side angles about election irregularities and decisions over which ballots were spoiled and which were legal. The phrase "hanging chad" was heard for awhile.
Ben McKay was the real force behind the 2000 presidential recount?
individual rights
It hindered the re-vote of the presidential election between the two. If the recount had been allowed Gore may have become our then president, instead of Bush. There were also other different significants that came out of this case.
The Supreme Court does not have the power to appoint a president. You are probably referring to the election of 2000 when a portion of the Supreme Court denied another recount in Florida where the election was close . Florida's votes went to George W. Bush and he needed them to win the election. Later recounts seemed to indicate that Bush won, but some still say the election was decided by the court. Or in 1876, a panel which included five Supreme Court Justices and 10 Congressmen ruled on the credentials of several electors and ruled all the disputes in favor of Rutherford Hayes, giving him the election. Both Bush and Hayes lost the popular vote.
The U.S. Supreme CourtAnswerthe supreme court of americathe Supreme Court halted the recount in Florida
Typically, none.The Chief Justice of the United States (Supreme Court) traditionally administers the Oath of Office to the President-elect on Inauguration Day, but neither the justices nor the Court participate in the election process.In the case of Bush v. Gore, (2000), however, the Supreme Court's decision to stop Florida vote recounts on the somewhat dubious grounds that the recount violated Bush's 14th Amendment Equal Protection rights, resulted in the Court preempting the electorate in determining who won the popular vote.For more information on Bush v. Gore and the 2000 Presidential election, see Related Questions, below.
The electoral vote was very close and the vote in Florida was especially close. Furthermore, Florida's 25 electoral votes were enough to tip the election. After Bush was certified as the winner in Florida, a recount confirmed the Bush win. However, the Gore team filed suit alleging improprieties in the recount and eventually the Florida State Supreme Court ordered another large recount that could not be completed until late December. The US Supreme Court overruled the recount order and Bush remained the winner in Florida and so won the election.