Want this question answered?
William Pitt concentrated British soldiers in the colonies
In response to the change in British policies in the 1760s, the colonists organized boycotts, followed by a revolution
In response to the change in British policies in the 1760s, the colonists organized boycotts, followed by a revolution
In response to the change in British policies in the 1760s, the colonists organized boycotts, followed by a revolution
r67rh667ur4ru
Colonists were under British rule following the French and Indian War. The British put taxes on tea and this angered colonists. The Revolutionary War broke out in 1775.
Colonist did only one thing to get the British to change their policies. The only thing they did was write the British letters.
The British blamed the colonists for starting the war so they began to tax the colonists, which angered them. The country and the colonies began to fight with each other as many acts were placed upon the colonists. The results of the French and Indian war is what caused the Revolution.
Nonviolent discussion had gotten no results.
They were very touched, but... NOT IN A GOOD WAY... They strongly opposed their new Policies. Hated it enough to start a boycott, establish the Committee of Correspondence, the Boston Tea Part. And Eventually War with the British.
The events at concord changed the conflict between great Britain by the British were forced to retreat to Boston and the events effected the colonists by although Revere had been arrested, the colonists of Concord were warned by another rider.
From what I know, yes he did change History. How? because he told the colonists the british were coming by sea so that the colonists knew where to go to stop the British form invading america. I hope this is helpful. Though I do know that paul revere never made it to his destination, Concord. He was captured shortly after leaving Lexington