He wanted lasting peace and fairness. the other three members wanted the central powers to pay.
they were more inspiring and he cancelled war
Wilson wanted a treaty that stressed openness, fair trade, and fewer weapons, but other leaders wanted to punish Germany for starting the war.
"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.
"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.
"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.
m
well first Germany wanted to have everything for themselves, and they wanted to kidnap every women so they can have sex with each and every one
well first Germany wanted to have everything for themselves, and they wanted to kidnap every women so they can have sex with each and every one
I think you just answered your own question. There is definitely a difference between the two. Roosevelt was obviously a tougher person and believed in a strong military and didn't care as much about morals during war.
he is the leader of assassination supreme court
he allowed slavey
Tuskegee institute.
Wilson promised to preserve free economis competition
America today has elected leaders, whereas monarchy gives a country hereditary leaders.