The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
There are loads of important dates and events that have to do with the ancient roman empire and I don't think there would be anyone kind enough to put them all in this little text box. you are stupid
There was Ancient Rome before present day Rome right? So - eventually, Ancient Rome started slipping away and archeologists just built over Anciet Rome. That kept happening until they had present day Rome and Ancient Rome - but Ancient Rome was underground
Ancient Rome was founded in 753 B.C.E.
No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.No. You are asking about ancient Rome. Television is a modern invention, needing electricity and other modern components. Ancient Rome had none of these things.
I think you mean the "parthenon". That is in Athens, not Rome. It is ancient and was built by the ancient Greeks.
People did not discover Ancient Rome, people BUILT Ancient Rome and it has been in continuous occupation since then 2,800years ago.
they were called a cemaforro
http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/1009/50213276.JPG
They made a fire and did a little Roman dance.
There are loads of important dates and events that have to do with the ancient roman empire and I don't think there would be anyone kind enough to put them all in this little text box. you are stupid
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.In ancient Rome a soothsayer was a fortune teller.
There was not a prince in ancient Rome.
how do you get places in ancient Rome
In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.In ancient Rome (Latin) "tata" means daddy.
There was Ancient Rome before present day Rome right? So - eventually, Ancient Rome started slipping away and archeologists just built over Anciet Rome. That kept happening until they had present day Rome and Ancient Rome - but Ancient Rome was underground
If you are referring to the great fire in Nero's reign, no one actually burnt the city. The fire started by accident in one of the shops that lined the Circus Maximus. It was a hot dry summer and the winds caused the fire to spread out of control. Poor old Nero got blamed for it because it was a known fact that he wanted to rebuild the slums of the city. The Christians , who were a disliked religious group due to their clannishness and aggressiveness, were hindering the firefighters and some ancient sources say that they even were seen carrying torches to spread the fire. This was due to the Christian belief at the time that Rome would be destroyed by fire before the Second Coming of Christ, which they thought was to happen immediately. So we have the blame game. Nero (who wasn't even in the city at the time) wanted cleared space for his building projects and the Christians who thought they were helping their God. So an accidental fire has become a two thousand year old controversy.