answersLogoWhite

0

The Anti-Federalists argued that a new Constitution would be a step towards monarchy and that the country would be bled dry through state and federal taxation.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did the anti-federalists present their argument against ratification?

by loling


What is discussion text?

Discussion text is used to present information and arguments from different perspectives or viewpoints. A discussion text typically has three components that are the issue, arguments for or against, and a recommendation or conclusion.


What is the year of ratification of a present illinois's constitution?

1971


How did the anti federalist present their arguments?

by loling


How do you answer a do you agree question in RE?

Present both arguments and explain what you view is.


Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence to present his arguments in a(n) tone?

reasonable


What arguments do the opponents present regarding the program of security and exchange commission?

money


What is the key to all arguments?

The key to all arguments is having logical information and facts. This will make it easier to present your case in opposition or in favor of the argument.


What arguments did opponents of annexing foreign territories present?

Against Expansion:-Against American ideals-Cost money For Expansion:-power-naval bases-competition among nations-market for goods


Is there are a for and a against in a information report?

Yes, typically an information report will present both arguments for and against a particular topic or issue to provide a balanced view for the reader. This helps to ensure that the reader is well-informed and can make their own judgments based on a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.


What is the weakest part of anti federalists?

The weakest part of the Anti-Federalists was their lack of a unified alternative to the Constitution, which made it difficult for them to present a cohesive vision for governance. Their arguments often relied on fear of centralized power without offering practical solutions for effective federal governance. Additionally, their emphasis on states' rights sometimes undermined their appeal to a broader audience concerned about national unity and strength. This fragmentation ultimately weakened their position against the Federalists during the ratification debates.


How do you answer notice of motion and motion for judgment?

To respond to a notice of motion, you typically have to file a written response with the court before the hearing date. In the response, you address the allegations or arguments raised in the motion and provide your own arguments or evidence. For a motion for judgment, you can either oppose the motion by arguing against it or present your own evidence and arguments in support of the judgment being requested. It is important to adhere to the specific rules and deadlines set by the court for filing your response.