Want this question answered?
The Aztecs were neither very rich or very poor
They where very rich. Two rooms with silver and a room with gold.
Rich Romans lived in amazing houses poor Romans didn't. Rich Romans ate delectable food poor Romans didn't rich Romans had money poor ones didn't rich ones didn't work poor ones did but there is a difference between poor Romans and slaves were people who were very poor and were owned. and if you want to learn the difference between slaves and rich people or poor people and slaves i recommend going on to wikipedia it is a very advanced website that has about 20 A4 pages about every single precise subject.
Clothes- poor- Men wore short garments called kilts women wor a dress attacheed to their shoulders children or slaves went naked rich- wore tunics houses- poor-homes made of mud bricks with about 4 rooms rich- houses with many rooms
Hades is seen as very wealthy, because he is not only the God of the dead, he is also the God of riches and wealth.
The Aztecs were neither very rich or very poor
he was very rich he was very rich.
well she didnt grow up very rich but later when she was still a little younger she had money now that she has all grown she is very rich she is very pretty to hope this helped holla
Very Rich
Rich. Very rich.
very rich
no it is not
It is a very poor country.
Rich but very, very corrupt.
Not at all. However, the spread between rich and poor is much more pronounced. In the USA or UK or Canada, there are rich people and poor people but generally the rich are reasonably rich and the poor still usually have a roof over their heads, or, even if homeless, are able not to starve because of a welfare state. However, in India the rich tend to be very very rich, whilst the poor are very very poor - and there are a lot more poor people than in western countries, so, on average, India can be thought of as a poor country although there are many living there who are very rich.
yes she was very rich.
She was not rich, but not very poor either.