They has to pray
The British in the 1700s
The British in the 1700sthe british in the 1700s
The Mughal rulers were different from earlier Muslim rulers of India because most of the people who ruled were Hindu's. Eventually a ruler Akbar persuaded Hindus an Muslims to live more peacefully together. ~I hope that helped you!:)
Singing, dancing
It is not true. The Muslims wanted a separate homeland in India because they feared that after the British left India, there would be Hindu Raj in India. Thus it would not be Freedom for the Muslims. It would be just the change of the Rulers. The Muslims were in majority in Bengal, the Punjab, Sindh, Baluchistan and North West Frontier Province. They were a separate nation with their own distinct religion, culture and traditions. They struggled hard to establish a separate homeland and succeeded in their struggle for freedom when Pakistan came into being on 14th August, 1947.
The Muslims dominated India during the Maghul Empire.
No, India does not have a monarch. The rulers are elected.
In India, cultural attitudes towards consuming pork vary widely. While some communities, such as Muslims and Christians, do consume pork, it is generally avoided by Hindus due to religious beliefs that consider the pig impure. Overall, pork consumption is less common in India compared to other meats like chicken, mutton, and fish.
Pakistan used to be part of India. At the time that India ceased to be a British colony, a religious war broke out between the Hindus and Muslims of India, and the Muslims (who were outnumbered) fled to the north, creating a Muslim enclave which seceded from India.
There are Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, and muslims in India.
The Ahmadi's were the group of people pushed towads India as they are not considered true Muslims.
Muslims