They were alarmed. They felt that the Sugar Act took away some of their basic rights. It took away their right to a jury. A lawyer, James Otis had stated that they shouldn't be taxed by the parliament because they had no say in the parliament. The colonists were getting angry. the New York legislature had stated that they would have no happiness, liberty, or security since their colonial life was being interfered with.
They were angry. The tax lowered the tax on molasses, but unlike the molasses act, the sugar act was enforced. The colonists ignored the molasses acts higher tax and just smuggled the goods, but they couldn't do that with the sugar act. It was also the first act the British passed that the only purpose of it was to make money from the tax. Needless to say, the colonists were angry.
they boycotted English goods
The colonist didn't organize the sugar act. It was a British law.
hvfuyfyfv
tea act *no, its the Sugar Act*
he wanted to help end it
How did the colonist react to the Glorious Revolution
The colonist didn't organize the sugar act. It was a British law.
The English King reacted to the colonists petition about the Sugar Act and Stamp Act by repealing the Stamp Act. Ben Franklin went and argued in front of English Parliament warning of a revolution.
The sugar act Astrid,
hvfuyfyfv
The petition worked, but in 1766 Parliament passed the Declaratory Act, which said Parliament had total control over the colonies.
The petition worked, but in 1766 Parliament passed the Declaratory Act, which said Parliament had total control over the colonies.
The colonist didn't organize the sugar act. It was a British law.
boycott
**The suger act lowered the taxes on molasses imported by the colonist
tea act *no, its the Sugar Act*
concern and mad i think
There reactions were mild and with no violence.