Mining the walls was the process of digging under the castle walls to remove their support so they would fall down.
MEDIEVAL people soldered with what looks like dreidal that was cast from the same metal (i.e. copper smiths had copper ones) and they generally had an iron bar comming out the flat part, they would be heated to melting temp and then applied to the seams. and these were common and had to be re dressed into a new point quite often. blacksmiths generally never had them because of ferrous work, but copper tin gold and silver smiths all had them in their shops. the gold and silver smiths often re dressed them and cast them themselves. just because of the danger of sending out for a new shipment and having it stolen. these soldering rods were usually dressed by a medival grinding wheel. if your thinking of pre-medieval times before 410 ad( the fall of rome and what was considered the beggining of the dark or medieval ages) soldering was, as far as i know, done with a crucible that had molten metal in it and poured on the 2 items. if your talking about ferrous work (stuff that contained iron) they did whats called forge welding, which was where they heated up the metal in the forge to a little over yellow hot, cleaned the scale and then applied a medieval flux of somesort, then they were re heated to the point of almost melting, and then they took it to the anvil and beat it together. hope it helps- ramsies11
The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.The wolf has been a symbol of Rome since ancient times. Both Cicero and Pliny the Elder mention a statue of the wolf and there have been numerous representations of the Wolf all over the empire. Th present day sculpture, however, is not from ancient times. It is thought to be a piece of work dating from the 1200's.
Slavery originated in stone age times, in those days there were no machines so all work had to be done by hand labour. Since it was sometimes difficult to find enough volunteers to do labour work; people would take captives and force them to do the labour for them.
The sword was named Kaletvwlch in medieval Welsh texts (usually modernized as Caledfwlch in modern versions of those texts). In medieval French tales the sword is named Caliburn, later fancied up to Escalibor. Sir Thomas Malory in his Le Morte d'Arthur rendered the name as Excalibur.Because Malory's work was so popular in English, that form of the name is the one which later English authors mostly use. It is also used in some English translations of medieval works where the name is found differently in the source language.Some medieval romances give other minor variations in spelling.According to Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Britianniae (the earliest surviving biography of Arthur) the sword Caliburn had been forged in the Island of Avalon but this account tells nothing of how Arthur obtained it. According to the medieval, so-called Vulgate Merlin account, Caliburn was identical to the nameless sword which Arthur pulled from the sword and so became king. According to the medieval, so-called Post-Vulgate Merlin Arthur was given Caliburn after he became king by a lake fay and it is unrelated to the sword in the stone.A version of the Post-Vulgate Merlin occurs in a manuscript named Cambridge Add. 7071 in which material from the Vulgate Merlin is also included and which according identifies Escalibor with the sword in the stone, but later in contradiction identifies it with the sword given to Arthur by the lake fay. Sir Thomas Malory derived the earliest section of his Le Morte d'Arthur from a similar combined account and so gives both contradictory origins for Excalibur with no attempt at an explanation.Excalibur
Yes and no. Whether a medieval worker was paid depended on the situation. Many serfs worked on manors where they raised all sorts of crops. Instead of paying rent on the land they used, they worked on the fields the lord of the manor owned. In addition to getting use of land and a home, they also got protection from criminals and armies in wartime out of this, but money was not part of deal. People who were not serfs generally worked for pay or for themselves. There were also times when the serfs got paid.
blacksmiths, butchers, gold and silver mining, agriculture (slavery), or worked for a landlord.
To get work done.
What work did the peasants do in medieval times
kill people
To be more specific medicine was what they thought would work. A lot of the medicine did work in their own way. But most of them did not.
we work
they wore aprons for work
In medieval times it is likely that a cook did not receive a salary. Generally, the cook would work for room and board with little or no time off.
A Bailiff is a an officer in a medieval village, appointed by the lord or his steward, who was in charge of overseeing the agricultural work of a manor.
In medieval times peasants would farm the land, as well as do general repair work and labor work. Everyone would fetch water, as there was no running water.
Usually a noble or someone of higher rank, but alot of times it was a land owner
Yes and it is: Walls don't fall when mining (hold L to work) 94000130 fdff0000 62251380 00000000 B2251380 00000000 200009e7 000000ff D2000000 00000000