In Genesis ch 9, it is recorded that Noah got spectacularly drunk and ended up lying naked in his tent. Ham saw this and told his brothers; they went to the trouble of getting a sheet, walking backwards into the tent and covering their father.
Upon learning of this, Noah cursed Ham to be the servant of his two brothers.
Answer:
The biblical evidence leads to the understanding that either Ham or his son, Canaan, sodomized Noah while he lay unconscious and drunk.
The wording in the KJV says: "...Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father..." (Gen.9:22).
In verse 24; Noah awakes from his drunken stupor: "...and knew what his younger son HAD DONE unto him."
It's evident that "seeing something" isn't "doing" anything to anyone.
To assess this further... a close wording of "seeing the nakedness" of one's relatives is found in the "Levitical laws" [Lev.18]. While most people assume that these laws didn't come into existence until Moses wrote them down centuries later... this passage in Genesis 9 proves otherwise.
Just as Noah knew what "clean" and "unclean" animals were, that he took on the ark with him [Gen.7]... we can read of what animals these were by what Moses wrote down centuries later for our edification, today, in these last days [Acts 7:38].
In Leviticus 18, we read: "None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to UNCOVER their nakedness: I AM the Lord..." (Lev.18:6).
While this seems to be NOT such a great sin to our somewhat calloused psyches in these end times... this is how the NIVtranslates this passage:
"No one is to approach any close relative TO HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS. I AM the LORD."
The biblical evidence, then, points to either Ham... or his son, Canaan, sodomizing, respectively, either his father... or his grandfather.
The fact that Noah cursed "Canaan" rather than Ham could either mean that Noah was cursing Ham's children for what he, Ham himself, had done... or Canaan, the son of Ham, for his own sin.
Either way... it's evident that what would later become known as a "Levitical law"... was known to Noah and his sons from across the flood. And it becomes clear that "seeing the nakedness of his father" wasn't what was "done" to Noah... but "sexual relations" had been committed, more than likely by Ham's son, Canaan.
The NIV doesn't translate Genesis 9:22 as "having sexual relations" as it does in Leviticus 18. It says that Ham "SAW his father's nakedness"... not that he "uncovered" his father's nakedness [as Lev.18 words it], or did any actual "uncovering."
This lends to the probability that Ham's son, Canaan was the culprit... and Ham was devastated and utterly shamed by it when he discovered [SAW] it, later. And in that shame, informed his brothers of the vile thing that happened.
This would explain why Noah cursed "Canaan," specifically... and not Ham.
In any event... it's evident that the "mistreatment" of Noah by his younger son... probably Canaan... was "illicit sexual relations."
No, Nimrod was not the grandson of Noah. According to the Bible, Nimrod was the great-grandson of Noah through his son Ham.
The Bible does not say.
This is his name according to relevant Bible references.
Noah's son Shem (Genesis ch. 6 and ch. 10) was the one among Noah's three sons who most assiduously carried on his father's traditions.
Grandson of Noah and first-named son of Japheth, born after the Flood.
According to Jewish mythology, Noah was wearing the same coat of skins that God gave to Adam to cover his nakedness when he was cast out of the Garden of Eden. So Noah knew that Ham (Noah's younger son) had stolen the coat of skins (which was supposed to represent the birthright and have special powers) and made a copy of it.
They were descendants of Heth, a son of Canaan (a son of Noah through Ham). See related links for more info.
Ashkenaz was the first son of Gomer in the Hebrew Bible followed by Riphath and Togarmah. Ashkenaz was a great grandson of Noah through Japheth in the Hebrew Bible.
Ham, son of Noah, was cursed for doing something he should not have done (seeing his father Noah drunk and naked). Answer B: The Bible does not say that Ham was cursed. It says his son Canaan was cursed.
Ashkenaz was the first son of Gomer in the Hebrew Bible followed by Riphath and Togarmah. Ashkenaz was a great grandson of Noah through Japheth in the Hebrew Bible.
Yes. it lists all the father-son combinations back to Adam.
The three sons of Noah were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. They were believed to be the ancestors of all the different nations and peoples in the world.