Usually when someone got tired of their slave they sold it, and then they were forced to look their best or sometimes they were beaten. Only when you bought them could you actually have them.
Farming and other hard labor.
No, slaves did not typically take their owners' last names during the time of slavery. Instead, they were often given or forced to use the last names of their owners as a way to assert ownership and control over them.
Slaves owners deprived their slaves of the many things we, today, take for granted. Slaves were not allowed education, they were not allowed to go out how and when they wanted, they were not allowed to vote, they were not allowed to compain when they are abused, and slaves were not allowed to sleep in bed and wear proper clothing.
Slaves took their owners' last names as a way to show ownership and control over them. It was a common practice during slavery to strip slaves of their own identities and replace them with the names of their owners, reinforcing the power dynamic between slave and owner.
The slave owners bought their slaves at auctions.
depends. Plantation owners had slaves ranging from 20 to 100s. home owners had slaves as servants ranging from 1 to 3. the armies too had slaves. the number of slaves owned depended on the needs of the owners.
Ships from Europe would buy slaves from other slave owners in Africa (YES there were slave owners in Africa!) and then transport them into docks in southern states bordering the Atlantic. There owners from the States could buy or trade them.
The term you are looking for is Manumission- the owner of a slave might free the slaves that he owned.
Yes. Females slaves were raped by owners to give birth to Mulatos, which were slaves as well.
trusted slaves or there owners
slaves can do anything their owners say they have to do.
No the slaves had to take care of their own babies. :( ruthless people!