Most people, North and South, were hoping that a future war could be avoided by this sensible arrangement of letting the local population of each new state vote whether to be slave or free. ('Popular Sovereignty')
But the result was a miniature Civil War in Kansas, with terrorists from outside the state intimidating voters and declaring every election result to be a fraud.
It was the tragic curtain-raiser for the real Civil War.
they viewed it as a good way of getting rid of slavery
They were quite hopeful about the chances of local people voting for slavery - given a little persuasion by bully-boys from out-of-state.
Southerners thought congress should protect their borders.
Kansas-Nebraska act
Southerners wanted him to remove the Native Americans from the South
Because the southern states had rebelled against the USA.
Because of the Fugitive Slave Act, where official slave-catchers were appointed to return runaways to their owners.
Southerners thought congress should protect their borders.
Kansas-Nebraska act
so they wouldn't lose their dignity
Southerners had to accept that the blacks were no longer slaves and were in fact free. The American Civil war ended in 1865.
Southerners opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to ban slavery in territories acquired from Mexico, which threatened the balance of power between slave and free states in the U.S. They believed it went against their rights to bring slaves into new territories and feared it could lead to the restriction of slavery in existing states.
African Americans
They thought that granting popular sovereignty would allow slavery
President Grant helped to pass The Enforcements Act to prevent Southerners from using fear to shut African Americans out of the political process.
We still hate him.
I think that mostly the Southerners were totally for slavery.
Cotton is more important than it
They thought that granting popular sovereignty would allow slavery