The same way, but with different tools and skills. If hadn't been for people experimenting there would have been no scientific revolution. The foundation of anything is based on the past.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
It didn't because before the scientific method there were no scientists. Scientists are professionals that employ the scientific method to do their work.
It didn't because before the scientific method there were no scientists. Scientists are professionals that employ the scientific method to do their work.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
Before the scientific revolution scientists would do mostly observations. These observations are what lead to the rise of patterns and the need for the scientific revolution.
scientists
communicating
On the work of classical and medieval scientists before them.
This process is called peer review. It involves experts in the field reviewing the manuscript to evaluate its quality, validity, and significance before it can be published in a scientific journal. Peer review helps ensure that the research meets the standards of the scientific community.
… They experimented more.
they relied more on observation