rite now , rich countries salve the poor countries, and loan like they give 25$ then they it ook u give it to me ll8ter, then they come back and say heres 50 dollars...give me 75 dollars back. but that countri didn;t even hAVE 25 dallors to use rite...so the rich countri says well u do owe me money, so y dunt u let me have the money, u should let me rule this part of the your county. so the rich country rules that county without war...so ya
No, slavery was mostly based in West, North, Central and East Africa. There is no history of slavery in Southern African countries like Zimbabwe.
If the slave did not do what they were told they would get HANGED!
The loss of slavery would threaten the Southern economy.
no the southern states approved of slavery and the northern states dissapproved of slavery
Slavery was limited to the southern states.
Slavery provided labor for the developing textile industries in the southern colonies.
the were pro slavery
They didn't have slavery. Only the southern did.
Slavery in the southern colonies increased after the invention of the cotton gin. This invention made plantation agriculture extremely lucrative; slavery was abolished in 1865.
The middle colonies produced different goods than the southern colonies. For example the Southern colonies produced cotton and tobacco, while the middle colonies produced other goods. In terms of slavery, the New England countries gave up slavery first. Middle colonies like New Jersey were one of the last states to abolish slavery.
The loss of slavery would threaten the southern economy
the northern and southern states differed in their attitudes toward slavery because the northern states were against slavery while the southern states were all for slavery, in fact they had slaves. The northern and southern states disagreed about it so much that it caused a war, known as the civil war.