Want this question answered?
espionage act and the sedition act
The justification of the Espionage and Sedition Acts during times of war is a subject of debate. Supporters argue that national security was a priority and these acts were necessary to protect it. Critics argue that these acts violated civil liberties, particularly freedom of speech, and were used to suppress dissent and stifle political opposition. Ultimately, whether these acts were justifiable depends on one's perspective and interpretation of the balance between national security and individual rights.
The Nazis didn't care about civil or human rights.
National interest is sometimes given priority over individual rights.In all three cases, the government, in the name of national security, restricted the civil rights of citizens.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is still in effect.
A law prohibiting interference with the draft and other acts of national "disloyalty." Together with the Sedition Act of 1918, which added penalties for abusing the government in writing, it created a climate that was unfriendly to civil liberties
the civil rights act has put positive effect on today citizens
From the earliest beginnings of this country (America), even as a British colony, some people have had some civil rights. The civil rights movement has been about giving more rights to more categories of people. This process is by no means complete. Civil rights, therefore, are still in the process of taking effect.
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
something
to change civil rights
This term is usually used in relationship of world affairs and countries. A "domino effect" as used in civil rights would mean that when one thing happens it leads to another and another. It would be a cause/effect.