they had better weapons and clever leaders. they would have stronger men too
The North's strategy to defeat the South during the Civil War, known as the Anaconda Plan, aimed to suffocate the Confederacy economically and militarily. This involved blockading southern ports to restrict trade, capturing key rivers to control transport and supply routes, and eventually launching coordinated attacks on key Confederate strongholds. The North also focused on leveraging its industrial advantages and larger population to sustain prolonged military campaigns. Overall, this multifaceted approach sought to dismantle the South's capacity to wage war and restore the Union.
The south they fought on their home land and they were motivated to fight
The south had more states and a larger union.
Sam Houston employed a strategy of strategic retreat and surprise. He led his troops in a tactical withdrawal to buy time, allowing them to regroup and train while avoiding direct confrontation with the larger Mexican Army. At the Battle of San Jacinto, he launched a surprise attack on April 21, 1836, catching the Mexican forces off guard and securing a decisive victory that ultimately led to Texas independence. This combination of evasion, preparation, and decisive engagement was key to his success.
MacArthur and Truman disagreed over strategy during the Korean War primarily due to differing views on the appropriate military response to Chinese intervention. MacArthur advocated for a more aggressive approach, including the potential use of atomic weapons and expanding the war into China, believing this would decisively defeat communism. In contrast, Truman favored a more measured approach to avoid escalating the conflict into a larger war with China, prioritizing the containment of communism without provoking a global confrontation. This fundamental clash in military philosophy and political strategy ultimately led to MacArthur's dismissal.
they had better weapons and clever leaders. they would have stronger men too
In the early stages from 499 BCE when Persia dominated, they were able to use Greek inter-city rivalries and disunity, ease of bribing their leaders, and in the field, the superiority of their cavalry and the fleets, which latter they levied from Phoenecia, Egypt and the Ionian Greeks as well. As the Greeks gained more cohesion and the will to combine for their common defence, they were able to consistently defeat the Persians on sea and land, until Persia agreed to peace in 449 BCE.
The Greek navy was able to defeat the Persian navy through superior tactics, better naval strategy, and the advantages of local knowledge. During the Battle of Salamis, the Greeks, led by Themistocles, used the narrow straits to their advantage, allowing their smaller, more maneuverable triremes to outmaneuver the larger Persian ships. Additionally, the Greeks demonstrated exceptional coordination and unity, which contrasted with the often disorganized Persian forces. This combination of strategic advantage and effective execution led to a decisive Greek victory.
The Greeks did not have an empire,
The Romans were able to construct buildings larger than the Greeks because they used concrete and had new architectural forms.
The Union side had a larger fighting force than the Confederate side during the American Civil War. The Union had more soldiers, resources, and industrial capacity, which contributed to their eventual victory.
A quantity-pricing strategy provides lower prices to consumers who purchase larger quantities of a product.
part of the larger national strategy for homeland security
They were known, at least, to the Ancient Greeks - perhaps earlier. I believe it was one of the Ancient Greeks who proved that the set of prime numbers was infinite (or "larger than any given set", or that there was no last prime number).They were known, at least, to the Ancient Greeks - perhaps earlier. I believe it was one of the Ancient Greeks who proved that the set of prime numbers was infinite (or "larger than any given set", or that there was no last prime number).They were known, at least, to the Ancient Greeks - perhaps earlier. I believe it was one of the Ancient Greeks who proved that the set of prime numbers was infinite (or "larger than any given set", or that there was no last prime number).They were known, at least, to the Ancient Greeks - perhaps earlier. I believe it was one of the Ancient Greeks who proved that the set of prime numbers was infinite (or "larger than any given set", or that there was no last prime number).
Jose de San Martin and Simon Bolivar used the tactic of uniting their armies to defeat Spanish forces in South America.ANS 2 -That's not a 'tactic' -it's just a safe decision when fighting a larger enemy.
Because the persian empire had a larger population and thus a larger army. they thought that the could concour greece because they wanted the land, the buildings and knowlage,and the glory. Finally they thought that they could defeat greece because The athenians had been fighting with the spartans and that made the m concievably weak.
I think it is because they had a democracy and the rest of Greece did not, in some retrospect the Greeks may have come up with a democracy.