answersLogoWhite

0

The principle of judicial review.

User Avatar

Herminia Hayes

Lvl 13
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did the Marshall court interpret the constitution in its ruling's?

The principle of judicial review.


How did the Marshal court interpret the Constitution in its ruling's?

The principle of judicial review.


How did Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rulings?

The principle of judicial review.


How did the Marshall court interpret the constitution in it rulings?

The principle of judicial review.


How did the Marshall court interpret the Constitution in rulings?

The principle of judicial review.


How did the marshall court interpret the constitution in its rulings?

it gave the federal government more power over the states


How did the Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rulling?

it gave the federal government more power over the states


How did the Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rullings?

it gave the federal government more power over the states


How did the marshal court interpret the constitution in the rulings?

The Marshall Court set the precedent that US laws could be devalidated if they were found to violate the US Constitution and gave the courts this power.


What court can interpret the Constitution?

Any court can interpret the constitution, but the US Supreme Court is the final arbiter on constitutionality.


According to John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison who or what should interpret the Constitution?

Chief Justice John Marshall believed interpreting the Constitution was the responsibility of the Judicial branchof government. The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution.


How did the Marshall Court interpret the Constitution?

The principle of judicial review.