0
The principle of judicial review.
What else can I help you with?
How did the Marshall court interpret the constitution in its ruling's?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the Marshal court interpret the Constitution in its ruling's?
The principle of judicial review.
How did Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rulings?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the Marshall court interpret the constitution in it rulings?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the Marshall court interpret the Constitution in rulings?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the marshall court interpret the constitution in its rulings?
it gave the federal government more power over the states
How did the Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rulling?
it gave the federal government more power over the states
How did the Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rullings?
it gave the federal government more power over the states
How did the marshal court interpret the constitution in the rulings?
The Marshall Court set the precedent that US laws could be devalidated if they were found to violate the US Constitution and gave the courts this power.
What court can interpret the Constitution?
Any court can interpret the constitution, but the US Supreme Court is the final arbiter on constitutionality.
According to John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison who or what should interpret the Constitution?
Chief Justice John Marshall believed interpreting the Constitution was the responsibility of the Judicial branchof government. The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution.
The authority claimed by John Marshall in this ruling is that the Supreme Court has the right of?
In this ruling, John Marshall asserted that the Supreme Court has the authority of judicial review, which allows it to invalidate laws and executive actions that are deemed unconstitutional. This principle established the Supreme Court as a key arbiter of the Constitution, reinforcing its role in maintaining the balance of power among the branches of government. Marshall's decision underscored the judiciary's responsibility to ensure that no law contravenes the Constitution, thereby solidifying its influence in American governance.
