0
What else can I help you with?
Did Romans have slave?
yes
How slaves for Roman becamecitizens?
No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.
How did you become a slave in ancient rome?
There were actually two common ways to become a slave in ancient Rome. One was to be born a slave and the other was to be a prisoner of war or part of the population of a town that the Romans enslaved.
What did female Roman slave do?
The serve wealthy Romans :D
Did Romans create slave-trade?
no but they did use it quite a lot.
Who was slave who lead a violent uprising against slave owners?
Toussaint l'Overture in Haiti: Spartacus against the Romans.
What do you call a person that own a slave?
A person who owns a slave is typically referred to as a "slave owner" or "master."
What do you call a person that owns a slave?
A person who owns a slave is commonly referred to as a slaveholder or slave owner.
What was Spartacus was responsible for?
A Slave Revolt,defeating many romans(armies)
When was the first slave bought?
The Greeks and the Romans were selling and buying slaves.
Why were Romans less likely to develop farming technology?
They had a seemingly endless supply of slave labor
Why were there different classes of slaves?
The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.
