0
What else can I help you with?
Did Romans have slave?
yes
How slaves for Roman becamecitizens?
No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.No slave or ex-slave could became a Roman citizen. A freed slave's children, however, were automatically citizens.
How did you become a slave in ancient rome?
There were actually two common ways to become a slave in ancient Rome. One was to be born a slave and the other was to be a prisoner of war or part of the population of a town that the Romans enslaved.
What did female Roman slave do?
The serve wealthy Romans :D
Did Romans create slave-trade?
no but they did use it quite a lot.
Who was slave who lead a violent uprising against slave owners?
Toussaint l'Overture in Haiti: Spartacus against the Romans.
What do you call a person that own a slave?
A person who owns a slave is typically referred to as a "slave owner" or "master."
What was Spartacus was responsible for?
A Slave Revolt,defeating many romans(armies)
When was the first slave bought?
The Greeks and the Romans were selling and buying slaves.
What do you call a person that owns a slave?
A person who owns a slave is commonly referred to as a slaveholder or slave owner.
Why were Romans less likely to develop farming technology?
They had a seemingly endless supply of slave labor
Why were there different classes of slaves?
The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.
