The Allies tried the highest up leaders of the Nazis at the Nuremberg Trials. Some were killed and others were put into prison for many years. Now, your question is HOW should the Allies deal with the Nazi war criminals after the war? That is a opinion question so I will tell you what I would have done. I would have dispensed all the civility (even though I am a Christian) and I would have had them all shot at one time with a very stern message to them about the sinfulness of what they did and they can now face their maker. The Nuremberg Trials took over a year and cost the taxpayers a lot of money. Do you think the Nazis gave fair trials to others? Not on your life. They just killed people at will. So even though I am a civil person I still would have dished out to them what they dished out to the Jews. I would have made them live in the concentration camps for 3 months with the amount of disgusting food they gave the Jews. Then I would have them shot.
During 1945 and 1946, and International Military Tribunal representing 23 nations put Nazi war criminals to trial in Nuremberg, Germany. In the first of these Nuremberg trials, 22 Nazi leaders were charged with waging a war of aggression. They were also accused of "committing crimes against humanity" (the murder of 11 million people).
Not to be flipant, but it depends on who you ask. You would likely get different answers were you to ask for the answer to be from the American, Britsh, French, Russian, Italian, Greek, Swiss, etc. If your question is, "Were the Allies 'fair' in their treament of the Post-War German leadership, the Western perspective would likely be "Yes".
If your question is "How did the Allies prosecute the War against Germany?", that is a vast question, beyond, I suspect, the constraints of this website. I would refer you first to Churchill's works on the War. There is a huge amount of material available. Reading "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany by William L. Shirer" would not be a bad idea.
The Allies brought Nazis Criminals to court. These trials were called the Nuremberg Trials, where war criminals were prosecuted. Most were sent to prison or sentenced to death.
With war...
War criminals should be punished according to the crimes they have committed.
they had to try all of the other 'Solutions', hence the Final in the 'Final Solution'.
The Nazi-Soviet nonaggression treaty contained a secret deal between Germany and the Soviet Union to divide Poland between them.
People should care about the atomic bomb attack because that is how WWII ended. It's a big deal considering that America was once allies with Japan and now they turn on the American citizens, so America decided to turn back on them and drop the Atom Bomb, or "Atomic Bomb".
If the question refers to the French resistance at Normandy in 1944, yes, they helped a great deal. Eisenhower credited them with saving a division's worth of Allies through their sabotage against the Germans and the information they provided.
peanut butter
Tried them at Nuremberg
Tried them at Nuremberg
Canada should deal with their war criminals by arresting them.
War criminals should be punished according to the crimes they have committed.
After the surrender of Germany in 1945 Allies arranged Nuremberg trials to try war criminals. These trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany.
After the surrender of Germany in 1945 Allies arranged Nuremberg trials to try war criminals. These trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany.
The Allies established the Nuremberg Trials to prosecute major Nazi war criminals for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide. Some were sentenced to death, while others received long prison terms. Additionally, many Nazis went into hiding or were involved in the ratlines that allowed them to escape to other countries.
Well, the SWAT are an advanced Police task force used to deal with dangerous criminals, whereas the Army is used to deal with terrorists and war criminals. I believe that the Army would win against SWAT.
Hitler's Appeasement was a policy of concessions accorded to Nazi regime in Germany by the British government under Neville Chamberlain and allies. There were many reason behind this policy but chiefly the Allies felt that Germany was accorded a raw deal under the treaty of Versailles and British forces at the time did not match German military juggernaut and were not in a position to fight a war.
The Aztecs had a system of laws and punishments to deal with criminals. Punishments for different crimes included fines, enslavement, and sometimes even death. The severity of the punishment depended on the severity of the crime committed.
they were angry