yes
The Anti-Federalist lost due to the fact that they were unorganized.
Anti-federalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution in 1787 - 89. They rejected the idea of a strong, central government. They feared that states, and mostly individuals, would lose their rights, and thus demanded that a Bill of Rights be created before they would even consider ratifying the Constitution.
Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution, because, as their name suggests, they distrusted a strong federal government such as the one the Constitution would create. Many antifederalists felt that a strong central government, rather than one granting autonomy and power to the states, would lose sight of the people's desires as the British government lost sight of the colonies' desires.
Federalist and the Anti-fedralist claimed to represent the true spirt of revolution, but i believe that the Antifedralists most represented the aims of the Recolution beacuse they remained wary of centralized control and the tendency of governments to become despotic and ruled by wealthy men, championed a declaration of indiviual rights, and feared that smaller state governments would lose power in a large centralized system.
At the beginning of the independent US, the Articles of Confederation was our Constitution (document stating the basic national laws) giving most of the power to the state government. A few years later, 55 men (including Ben Franklin and George Washington) were called to revise the Articles of Confederation. When they started the meeting, they decided that they needed a stronger national government therefore deleting the articles of confederation and starting the US Constitution. The Fedralists were the people who were for the new Constitution but the anti-fedralsists were against the new constitution. Most of the anti-fedralsists were in the state government and that is why they were against it; they would lose power.
The founding fathers didn't really insist on a bill of rights, the antifederalists did. Federalists were people who wanted a strong government, but antifederalists were afraid that if there was a very strong government, the states would be too weak, and that people would lose rights if the government was too powerful. So when the federalists wanted to approve the Constitution, antifederalists said they wouldn't, until the federalists put in a Bill of Rights. So the federalists added the bill of rights, so that the anti-feds would ratify the constitution.
Thomas Jefferson was a Democratic-Republican. *Although the party was not called the "Democratic Republicans" until around 1839. The party was initially called the Republicans (Different party than today's republicans) - but their opponents called them 'Democrats' insultingly. Eventually (after a few slight faction name shifts), the name was changed to "Democratic Republicans." *Thomas Jefferson was an anti-federalist, then a member of the Opposition (when George Washington was president), and -then- a Republican (Jeffersonian Republican) during the presidency of Madison. Factions at that time in history often changed names and goals (ie, the anti-federalists were against the consolidation of the nation under one government. Obviously, Jefferson helped unify our country and those problems were resolved, so after the constitution was finished, there was no real need for those parties anymore.)
The anti federalists who included patriots such as Patrick Henry certainly were not opposed to America' becoming a prosperous nation nor were they opposed to union. However they did not want to see the individual states lose any of their powers. Patrick Henry queried, " Who authorized them to speak the language of We the People instead of We the States? "
There were two main Anti-federalist arguments: a) The Constitution gave the federal government too much power and the people weren't represented by it. b) There was no Bill of Rights in the Constitution, and the people's rights weren't put in writing and guaranteed. There were some other, less pressing arguments, such as the ratification process (only 9 out of 13 had to ratify, and some thought all 13 states should have to ratify for the Constitution to go into effect). Also, some didn't like the fact that there was no mention of God in the Constitution. Others were angry that the states couldn't print money. c) They were not so happy about going back to a strong central government because if the government got too strong it could become a monarchy, and they just got out of one
During the war of 1812 they planned to secede from the United States
There are no signs. Christians don't lose debates.
The anti federalists who included patriots such as Patrick Henry certainly were not opposed to America' becoming a prosperous nation nor were they opposed to union. However they did not want to see the individual states lose any of their powers. Patrick Henry queried, " Who authorized them to speak the language of We the People instead of We the States? "