Want this question answered?
he observed many types of animals, especially birds. Such as the finch.
beaks
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
Depending on what adaptations you are speaking of, they usually make it easier for the birds to adapt to environmental changes
Darwin observed that small birds on the Galapagos islands differed in the shape of their beaks.The seeds that were left on the island were harder so the birds beaks evolved and became stronger and harder.
He saw birds of striking different form and structure to those of Europe and went further to establish that it was due to evolution.
Charles Darwin reached the Galapagos islands in 1835. He observed many finches, tortoises and many other animals. He observed that the animals in the Galapagos were different than the animals in other places like South America. This may be because the climate is different in the Galapagos than in other places so the animals may have involved to suit the temperatures in the Galapagos. Infomation source/s: http://www.zephyrus.co.uk/charlesdarwin.html
birds
Had Darwin discovered angry birds game.
thy adapt by all diffrent flowers
Diffrent
Darwin based his theory on things he saw. For example he noticed how farmers bred animals for different characteristics. Darwin also observed variations among birds and thought that this was a result of natural selection enabling some birds better survival chances that others. However Darwin's theory is deeply flawed because these changes can never result in new species being developed. Darwin said if it could be shown that complex things did not develop from simple things then his theory would not stand. Scientists know these days about the complex biological machines that are found inside cells and these cannot be reduced to simpler forms