Bushrangers obtained food by various means. Some of them stole provisions owned by the settlers in outlying areas, helping themselves freely to salted meats, potatoes, onions, flour and so on. They also stole from store owners in the towns.
Others hunted wild rabbits and native animals.
The first bushrangers were escapees of the convict system. They had no where else to go besides the bush. Technically they did need to steal because they couldn't go back to where they started, asking for food. They stole horses, food from farms, they robbed banks and they robbed from the rich. Some people became bushrangers perhaps out of boredom, and some where desperate to get away from everything.
bushrangers
A gang of bushrangers, like "Ned Kelly's gang."A collective noun is a word for a group of people or things. I don't believe that bushrangers, loners at heart, get together often enough for a collective noun to become theirs. You have to use a general collective noun used for people based on their situation or activity, including group to start you off; a troop of bushrangers, a crowd of bushrangers, a mob of bushrangers, a boatload of bushrangers, a convention of bushrangers, a meeting of bushranges, a party of bushrangers, or a pair of bushrangers.
Bushrangers mainly used horses.
well you wood have to brake the law
Murray Bushrangers was created in 1993.
Bushrangers primarily used horses for transportation.
Yes. Bushrangers were criminals who would ambush unsuspecting travellers or even landowners, stealing their money and goods. A few bushrangers resorted to murder.
Absolutely. Bushrangers posed a genuine threat, and many could be ruthless.
Bushrangers usually committed murder, robbery, theft, assault and other crimes.
Patrick and James Kenniff were regarded as Australia's last bushrangers. They were captured and brought to trial in 1902.
There was no leader of the bushrangers. Bushrangers operated in small gangs, or occasionally alone, and they formed one of the hazards of life in rural Australia for many decades. Therefore, there could be no single leader.