0
No. Sure, the Colonists might have been protected by Britain from France or Spain, but that was solely because of the dependence the Colonies had with Britain. If there was no connection with Britain, the Colonies might have had no enemies, since France and Spain were the enemy of BRITAIN not the colonists. This was proven when the French and the Colonist both unified to defeat the British in the R.W.
And after the taxes actually started to get enforced, the colonists really had no control over any lawful action. Parliament enforced unjust and biased laws on the Colonies, the King's way of rule was looked down upon in America and Mercantilism really served no purpose at this point in time. You could look at it like this. Just because a certain establishment founded a nation long ago does not mean that establishment could abuse it's power on that nation for founding it, ... long ago.
NOT ONLY THAT, but the distance and the difference in size between the two land masses only increased the difference margin for the colonists. How can such a small island like Great Britain, rule over the much bigger and farther landmass like America. It just doesn't work. Earlier when the colonies first started out it might have been necessary but it served no purpose later on.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which was true for the colonies under mercantilism?
Their activities were to benefit only the mother country.
What was true for the colonies under mercantilism?
Their activities were to benefit only the mother country.
What did the colonies consider themselves under mercantilism?
They were considered colonies... That was the whole principle of mercantilism: colonies helping the economic success of the motherland.
Under the economic policy of mercantilism which of these did the colonies not have to do?
Under the economic policy of mercantilism the thing that the colonies did not have to do was Manufacture the same items that were produced to England ------> Is MpK
Did the theory of mercantilism was based on the idea that colonies existed primarily for the economic benefit of the mother country?
(True) that is the theory of mercantilism.
Which was true for the colonies under mercantilism?
Their activities were to benefit only the mother country.
What was true for the colonies under mercantilism?
Their activities were to benefit only the mother country.
What is the belief that the colonies exist to benefit the economy known as?
mercantilism
The idea that colonies existed to benefit the mother country called?
Mercantilism.
Who had the theory which held that colonies exist for the benefit of the home country?
Mercantilism
What did the colonies consider themselves under mercantilism?
They were considered colonies... That was the whole principle of mercantilism: colonies helping the economic success of the motherland.
Under the economic policy of mercantilism which of these did the colonies not have to do?
Under the economic policy of mercantilism the thing that the colonies did not have to do was Manufacture the same items that were produced to England ------> Is MpK
The belief that colonies exist to benefit the economy of the mother country is known as?
Mercantilism. Held in the early days of settelment of the americas.
Did the theory of mercantilism was based on the idea that colonies existed primarily for the economic benefit of the mother country?
(True) that is the theory of mercantilism.
What did the mercantilists believe?
Mercantilism is the belief that colonies exist for the benefit of the mother country.
Did the colonies benefit from the mercantilism why or why not?
Well the governors were mean and didnt want to eat their children
Did The colonies benefit mercantilism Why or why not?
Well the governors were mean and didnt want to eat their children
