Actually, UN is the successor of League of Nations. After the end of the league, i.e, after the outbreak of second world war, the members thought it was better to form a new world organization rather than reforming the League.That's how UN was created, and the UN wouldn't have existed if the league had. so there's no question of UN playing ANY role in the end of the League of Nations..!!!
The UN wanted to do the same sort of thing (create world peace) but they made sure that they had strong councils so they wouldn't fail at doing this like the League Of Nations.
The precursor to the Current United Nations was called the League of Nations. The League of Nations was founded in 1919. When the United Nations was formed in 1945, the League of Nations basically ceased to exist.
United nations
The forerunner of the United Nations was called the League of Nations.
Warren G. Harding did not support the League of Nations. As a result, the United States did not join the group. Many of the member nations believed that the United State's failure to join, doomed the effectiveness of the organization from the start.
Original Answer: Because they are decades away. Improved: The United Nations are not a country. They couldn't have "joined" the League of Nations. The League of Nations was the predecessor of the United Nations - the League of Nations failed, and so, many years later in 1942 (I believe it was that year) they founded the United Nations as an improved "League of Nations."
The main reason that the League of Nations failed, was that the countries only thought for themselves.The absence of the U.S. was a large factor in the failure of the League of Nations, but the root cause of the failure of the League was that it had no real power.
Nothing. The League of Nations was the predecessor to the United Nations. (:
There is no League of Nations. We have United Nations
the leagueof nations and UN
The League Of Nations
the league of nations
It was superseded by the United Nations.