The British ruled directly over their colonies, while the French did not.
Stuff
The British ruled directly over their colonies, while the French did not.
AIM used tactics that were often confrontational and violent.
Civilizations often transcend Empires and are not dependent on their survival. For example, Roman civilization was both a Republic and an Empire.
You need to specify which empires you are referring to if you want to make it possible to answer you question.
british constitution differ from the US Constitution is that they dont have rule
Land areas controlled by different empires often differed due to a combination of factors such as military strength, economic resources, geographic advantages, and administrative efficiency. Empires like the Roman Empire thrived in areas with established trade routes and fertile land, while others, like the Mongol Empire, expanded rapidly through superior cavalry tactics and strategic alliances. Additionally, cultural assimilation and local governance approaches influenced the stability and longevity of territorial control. Ultimately, the unique historical contexts and ambitions of each empire shaped their territorial boundaries.
They used guerilla tactics
They used guerilla tactics
How does the project audit differ from the performance measjrement control system
The Ming and Qing dynasties practiced neo-Confucianism, while the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires practiced Islam
British viewed their Indian subject as resentment