First off, the genocide is not over, it is still going on, mainly in the region of Darfur. Ever since Khartoum, the capital of Sudan, armed the Janjaweed (Arab militias) in 2003, the violence has escalated, since the government can not control these rampaging murderers and rapists. The Janjaweed cooperates with the government in the complete and utter destruction of villages, more often than not those of African farmers. Since Sudan has often been plagued by droughts that led to famine, the country desperately needs every ounce of food it can get. The murder and destruction does nothing to help this. Also, the refugees forced to flee their homes to live in camps often collect firewood in order to make money and to survive, but due to frequent Janjaweed attacks, many of them have been raped repeatedly. The men don't dare leave the camp, for fear of being murdered or castrated. Economically speaking, the genocide is doing absolutely nothing good for the country, and it will continue to harm, it so long as countries like the USA. do nothing to help the victims.
The genocide did nothing good for the economy or the country as a whole. Cambodia is still very poor.
Typically, a genocide is "certified" by leading academics when a set of circumstances in the world qualifies under the definition of genocide. This is exactly what happened in the Cambodian genocide.
The Cambodian genocide.
No.
mike Jones did
south Vietnam
people killed other people
the cambodian war happened in 1971 and ended in 1985.
Pol Pot,the leader of the Khmer Rouge.
The efforts made by the Cambodian government and the international community to bring genocidal perpetrators to justice were significant.
Khmer Rouge was located in Cambodia, China.
Yes. The Cambodian genocide ended in 1979 when the Vietnamese Army invaded Cambodia and overthrew Pol Pot's government.
The cambodian genocide