answersLogoWhite

0


They relied more on evidence.

User Avatar

Beulah Skiles

Lvl 13
2y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did the scientific revolution change change the way in which scientists did their work?

… They experimented more.


How did the scientific method change the way scientific came to a conclusion?

It didn't because before the scientific method there were no scientists. Scientists are professionals that employ the scientific method to do their work.


How did scientific revolution change the way in which scientists did their work?

… They experimented more.


How did the scientific change the way scientists did their work?

they relied more on evidence


How did the scientific revolution change the way in which scientists their work?

… They experimented more.


How did the scientific revolution change how scientists did their work?

they relied more on observation


How did the scientific revolution change the way in which scientists did their work?

… They experimented more.


How did the scientific method change the way scientist came to a conclusion?

It didn't because before the scientific method there were no scientists. Scientists are professionals that employ the scientific method to do their work.


How did the scientific revolution change the way scientists did their work?

They relied more on evidence.


How did Scientific Revolution change the way scientists did that work?

It led scientists to question the traditional beliefs about the workings of the universe.


How did the scientific revolution change they in which scientist did their work?

Scientists were expected to conduct experiments to prove / disprove their hypothesis and theories.


What did thomas kuhn discover during the scientific revolution?

Thomas Kuhn did not discover anything during The Scientific Revolution (1500-1700s, or Copernicus-Newton basically). He lived during the twentieth century and was most influential with his work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) and his radical, sociological take on the philosophy of science. He did write about scientific revolutions and determined that science follows a predictable cycle of what he called crisis and normal science.