Want this question answered?
well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
It depends on which society. There were hundreds of ancient societies. Usually the top classes are described as aristocracies. Priestly classes could also be part of the top social layer or even the top class, as with the Hindu Brahmins .
Prosperity led to another major change in society~the development of social classes
A caste is any of the hereditary social classes of traditional Hindu society. An example of a caste class is the Shudra, who were the unskilled laborers.
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.
well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
most of the houses were mud brick homes and if u were rich u could get a stone home
Social pyramid
well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
The four broad social classes were: ruling, nobility, peasants, and slaves.
well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
It depends on which society. There were hundreds of ancient societies. Usually the top classes are described as aristocracies. Priestly classes could also be part of the top social layer or even the top class, as with the Hindu Brahmins .
well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
Social classes- a broad group in society having common economic, culture, or political status
Prosperity led to another major change in society~the development of social classes
It kept the classes the same.
It kept the classes the same.