Want this question answered?
Reformers opposed the spoils system because it was inefficient and unfair.
No, the spoils system was based around corruption. In general there wasn't much anyone could do to reduce corruption, it was a corrupt government.
No, the spoils system was based around corruption. In general there wasn't much anyone could do to reduce corruption, it was a corrupt government.
No, the spoils system was based around corruption. In general there wasn't much anyone could do to reduce corruption, it was a corrupt government.
This question refers to the spoils system (as opposed to a competitive merit based promotions and appointments). The spoils system is used synonymously with the concepts of corruption and the party machine politics.
This system of corruption is generally termed as the SPOILS SYSTEM.
Hannah montana
No, the spoils system was based around corruption. In general there wasn't much anyone could do to reduce corruption, it was a corrupt government.
spoils system
The spoils system awarded official possitions to people who did not deserve them. These possitions were based on an individuals loyalty to a successful party or candidate rather than their competancy as an offical for that possition. In the progressive era, one goal was to eliminate corruption in the government. Obviously they chose the spoils system as one of their main targets
It was reward for political support,so offices went to political allies,not to those best able to do the job. Political corruption in high government in its most base form.
Spoils system