The so-called spoils system which called for the President to make appointments to a large number of government jobs could lead to great turmoil when the administration changed parties. The old appointees might still be loyal to the previous president and maybe would not obey the new president However, they had experience and a large turnover would impair their office's ability to function. It was very difficult for the president to wisely fill so many positions -- it was tempting to just appoint supporters and was tempting for people to participate in a campaign in order to get a job if it was successful.
Jobs were given to people who were not qualified
It eventually lead to the government constantly hiring unskilled workers.
Reformers opposed the spoils system because it was inefficient and unfair.
No, the spoils system was based around corruption. In general there wasn't much anyone could do to reduce corruption, it was a corrupt government.
No, the spoils system was based around corruption. In general there wasn't much anyone could do to reduce corruption, it was a corrupt government.
No, the spoils system was based around corruption. In general there wasn't much anyone could do to reduce corruption, it was a corrupt government.
This question refers to the spoils system (as opposed to a competitive merit based promotions and appointments). The spoils system is used synonymously with the concepts of corruption and the party machine politics.
This system of corruption is generally termed as the SPOILS SYSTEM.
The spoils system introduced a new level of corruption in American Government as well as placing "leaders" who had no real ability to lead other than their friendship with elected officials. It is well proven that corruption hurts economic development as well as the people's trust in their government. People work together more efficiently when there is mutual trust, thus everything becomes less efficient and waste expands.
Hannah montana
It was reward for political support,so offices went to political allies,not to those best able to do the job. Political corruption in high government in its most base form.
No, the spoils system was based around corruption. In general there wasn't much anyone could do to reduce corruption, it was a corrupt government.
The spoils system awarded official possitions to people who did not deserve them. These possitions were based on an individuals loyalty to a successful party or candidate rather than their competancy as an offical for that possition. In the progressive era, one goal was to eliminate corruption in the government. Obviously they chose the spoils system as one of their main targets
Spoils system