Want this question answered?
because...
For the most part, trench warfare in the US Civil War was quite different than trench warfare in wars fought after it. For example, there is the misconception that trench warfare in World War One was a throw back to the trenches in the US Civil War. Here are the differences: 1. Trench warfare in the context of the US Civil War refers to battles that were centered on the presence of significant earthworks used primarily for defense; and 2. Trench warfare in World War One for example was the result of bogged offensives that created a matrix of complicated trenches that provided a "shelter" for armies of both sides in between repeated charges over a "no mans land" that usually ended in a draw.
He improved the economy and got us out of the Great Depression.
African migration made the united states turn toward communism
Thailand is more politically close to the US.
many people in Russia grew afraid of the belif that they were going to be attacked by the us causing Great stress between both countries
There was a lot of similarity to trench warfare in that US forces were often dug in or placed into positions like fire bases that the Vietminh regularly shelled.
The TG resolution resulted in direct open warfare between Washington (US) and Hanoi (N. VN).
Along the southern coast of Alaska is the Aleutian Trench.
Yes it is, infact most, if not all, elite military outfits are thought to dig trenches or foxholes to hold a position or to over look a hostile valley. In Afganistan, US army soldiers use trenches to better spot and elimate the Taliban and other organisations.
The us government
politically strong and prosperous