with parliament control
to not be criticised
I think it is because Charles I wanted to rule without parliament for a while and he married a Catholic Princess when most of his country were Protestants.
King Charles I
yes
He got money and troops from France.
In a nutshell - Charles I believed in the Divine Right of Kings and wanted to rule as an 'absolute monarch'. Basically this means that he believed Parliament existed to serve him. Because Parliament believed differently, that the King ruled with Parliament and was not above the laws of the land, Charles and Parliament would clash and Charles would end up dismissing Parliament and trying to rule without them. A bit difficult to do, since Parliament held the purse strings. Charles would use what ever means he could find to raise money without having to recall Parliament, means that weren't always legal or ethical. In the end, when he was finally forced to call a Parliament, they turned on him; Charles tried to evict them, they refused to leave, he called an army and the Civil War began. In the end, Charles lost his head, his family went on the run and Cromwell ruled the country as dictator for several years.
the petition of right
Reign of Charles I. 1625-1649, reign of Charles II. 1649-1685. Christoph
Charles 1st
because he did not have a good relationship with the parliament at the time, the parliament did not want to gave money to him...
because he did not have a good relationship with the parliament at the time, the parliament did not want to gave money to him...
He was the first English King that could not rule with absolute command. His power was split with Parliament's.