poo poo wee wee testicle balls boobs
they use the evidence from the past that will tell them what exactly happened, or they ask people who were at that certain place and time.
No they don't because some historians believe that the universe was created by the big bang and others by god. Or the dinosaurs some historians think they were killed by a meteor. They don't agree about everything because there isn't enough evidence to prove something. And it is OK.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
The Rosetta Stone had three different languages one of which was Greek, and another was hieroglyphs. Historians already knew Greek so they used it to sort of decode the hieroglyphics.
You aint always gonna get an answer my name is siri
Technology and electronics will be one of the major pieces of evidence that future historians will study of our generation and culture.
It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.
The writings of contemporary historians.
i think, they will study what we did in life
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legends because myths and legends tell what people believed and understood. Historians study by looking at journals, data, diaries etc., to learn information.
Historians identify the Neolithic Revolution through a combination of archaeological evidence and the study of ancient texts and artifacts. They look for signs of the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to settled agriculture and the domestication of plants and animals. This includes the presence of farming tools, evidence of grain storage and cultivation, and the establishment of permanent settlements.
evaluate the evidence used to support it
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
When exploring the periods for which there are no written records at all, historians have to reply on archaeological evidence.
Historians study the past by analyzing written records, documents, and artifacts to understand past events. Archaeologists study the past by excavating and analyzing physical remains like pottery, tools, and structures to reconstruct past societies. Anthropologists study human culture and society, often focusing on traditional lifeways, beliefs, and customs passed down through generations.
Answer this question… They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.