There is a large Minuteman silo complex near where I live. Any serious attack would involve hundreds of warheads on that site throwing up enough fallout to make the area I live in devoid of life for decades and risky to enter for about 200 years.
No, India has both civil nuclear power reactors and nuclear weapons
The US has refrained from using nuclear weapons due to the catastrophic human and environmental consequences associated with their use. Additionally, the world community, including the US, has generally upheld international agreements and norms that seek to prevent the use of nuclear weapons.
they are helping north Korea and giving them a lot of money and resources so they don't set the nuclear weapons off. This is good because now only a couple terrorist have nuclear weapons and everyone has less of a chance of dying.
Those that are nuclear, such as the nuclear bombs.
Zambia does not have nuclear weapons.
In nuclear weapons depots.
Nuclear weapons are weapons which are fueled by nuclear energy. Examples of weapons that can be fueled by nuclear energy are missile warheads and bombs.
Yes, they are nuclear weapons.
NO. Afghanistan does not have nuclear weapons, nor did it have nuclear weapons at any time, nor has it been accused by other countries of having nuclear weapons. Afghanistan is also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, for what that's worth.
Pakistan has about 100 nuclear weapons.
No, Nazi Germany had no nuclear weapons.
nuclear deterrence - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will attack you back with nuclear weaponsmutual assured destruction - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will totally destroy you with nuclear weapons and if I attack you with nuclear weapons then you will totally destroy me with nuclear weapons - thus any nuclear attack by either party will result in the certain destruction of both parties