answersLogoWhite

0

People think they know the theory of evolution is false primarily because it contrasts with their religious beliefs. For Christians, The Bible says that man was created from the dust of the earth. This is a source of pride for such people because, if true, it would mean they were special. Evolutionary theory, on the other hand, says that man is descended from lower primates who developed through the forces of natural selection over many millions of years. This would mean they were not special and were themselves animals. This offends Christians because they believe man is superior to the beasts of the earth. This has ties to ancient Greek philosophy. Greek philosophers believed only man was capable of thinking. Animals were considered only mindless automatons. This way of thinking lives on in the minds of the religious.

Those that do find fault with evolution usually know very little about the subject. The reasons listed in the first answer above are evidence of this. For instance, the second law of thermodynamics does refer to an increase of entropy in a closed system. However, the earth is not a closed system because it receives energy from the sun's rays. The rest of the answer is an appeal to emotions since it asks readers to gauge the validity of evolution based on the way they think it should be-in this case, that god created man and the universe-as opposed to surveying the readily available evidence.

Back to the question, some highly educated people with degrees in science have proposed various objections to evolution. Michael Behe, for example, has proposed "Irreducible Complexity," the theory that life is too complex to have come about through natural selection. A famous example is the flagellum, a whip-like protrusion, of bacteria. Behe posited that the twirling motion of the flagellum would stop working and become useless if any one of its components were removed. The overall theory was tested and debunked in a court of law

(see Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District). Despite this, Irreducible Complexity is a very strong rallying point for religious people since they feel it is a more valid scientific theory than evolution.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

A change in gene frequency in a population over time is a foundation of biological evolution true or false?

True. That is the definition of evolution.


Why don't people believe in the theory of evolution?

" Believe in " is the operative word here. People let there feelings and beliefs get in the way of accepting the evidence for evolution. Some have been heavily indoctrinated into either or positions. Either evolution is false or my beliefs are false. When you are given over to belief without evidence then many hang tenaciously onto those beliefs and put themselves on the wrong side of a false dichotomy.


Is it true or false that the most people know about all the occupations which are available?

False


Is it true that the concept of Lucy's evolution is false?

The concept of Lucy's evolution is not false. Lucy, a 3.2 million-year-old hominid fossil, is an important discovery in understanding human evolution.


The terms development and evolution have the same meaning in physiology.true or false?

False. In physiology, development refers to the process of growth and maturation of an individual, while evolution refers to the gradual changes in a population over generations. Development is focused on individual changes, while evolution pertains to changes at the population level.


What is true Individuals are constantly evolving. Populations are constantly evolving. Evolution involves descent with modification. Acquired characteristics lead to evolution.?

Individuals are constantly evolving - False. Populations are constantly evolving - True. Evolution involves descent with modification - True. Acquired characteristics lead to evolution - False.


What is an example of false causality?

Examples of false causality are the claims that chance, mutations or survival can drive upward evolution.


Is the process of evolution is most commonly seen as a rapid change in the characteristic of and individual organism true or false?

That is false.


Is this statement true or false evolution involves descent with modification?

True.


Do any scientists today who are not creationists express dissent from Darwin and his views?

Such a person would have to meet three requirements: 1) Publishes articles in peer reviewed scientific journals. 2) Religious or not, he/she doesn't concern him/herself with creationism. 3) Objects to evolution. I know of people who publish scientific articles and aren't religious/creationists - but they don't object to evolution. I know of people who publish scientific articles and object to evolution (though not simultaneously) - but they are creationists. I know of people who object to evolution but are not creationists - however they don't publish. I know of no people who meet all three criteria.


Evolution and natural selection stop if groups of a species are isolated from each other... true or false?

False. Isolation promotes natural selection of the unique mutations and recombinations in an isolated population, thus leading to evolution.


Is it true or false when Darwin returned to England he rushed his thoughts about evolution?

True