Want this question answered?
If I understand the question correctly, you are asking whether a scientify *theory* can be revised as new evidence is presented, and the answer is YES. This forms the entire foundation of science - any theory that cannot be revised is contrary to the scientific method; it has, in effect, become dogma. Any theory that cannot be demonstrated through the available evidence must be rejected. So, if a scientist discovers new data that invalidates a previously working theory, then that theory is rejected by the scientific community.
It will be replaced by a new theory when enough evidence is collected
If data conflicts with a scientific theory, then the theory must change or be abandoned. Scientific discipline requires the scientist putting forward a theory to attempt to disprove it before publishing his or her findings. Once published, the proposed theory is subjected to peer review, in which other scientists, competent in the relevant discipline, attempt to disprove the hypothesis. Only after thorough checking is a proposed theory accepted by the scientific community. Even then, it is constantly subjected to stress testing and analysis, as new data come to light.For example, Newtonian physics were eventually found to be invalid in special circumstances identified by Albert Einstein, and the relevant theories were amended accordingly.
All it takes is new data.
It is a new type of led the scientist use for pencils now in stead of toxic ones!
The theory is modified.
When there wrong about there theory. Like for example , if a scientist creates a new theory, but research proved it incorrect.
The scientific method is a body of techniques used to solve problems. When a scientist gains new information about a theory, the result is usually a new hypothesis.
how well existing scientific data are explained by the new theory.
They had to come with something new.
Scientist are always testing their models to get new information or results, but other times learning evidence makes scientist have to change their models so scientist can change their models in theory.
If they are mathematicians they can prove a theorem. In the physical sciences theories cannot be proved. The current theory is the one that fits the experimental evidence more closely than all alternative theories. When a new theory comes along that is more accurate, the old theory is superseded.
new technology
The new information or research will be either republished by the original scientist or sometimes a different group will take it and republish the scientific theory with the new information.
A hypothesis is a temporary explanation for some observation. It is then tested and, if is found to be incorrect, a new one has to be formed. If found to be correct, it becomes a theory. If that theory is later found to have a counter-example it is modified (hypothesis -> theory - same process) or a completely new hypothesis proposed and tested. The hypothesis alwasy comes before the theory. it is a practical explanation that the scientist develops that accounts for a theory.
Nope. They keep the theory the way it is. No one changes it. Usually, when scientist have tested the theory and find out something new, they create a new theory instead of changing the first one.
create a new theory to apply to the research he or she had completed