If they are mathematicians they can prove a theorem. In the physical sciences theories cannot be proved. The current theory is the one that fits the experimental evidence more closely than all alternative theories. When a new theory comes along that is more accurate, the old theory is superseded.
The singular possessive form of "scientist" is "scientist's." This indicates that something belongs to one scientist, such as "the scientist's research" or "the scientist's findings."
all i need to know is if there is a famouse scientist in ornithology??
The abstract noun of "prove" is "proof." It refers to the act of establishing the truth or validity of something.
is studying, collecting data and recording relevant information. These observations are based on the scientist's senses and are typically objective and unbiased. The scientist may use various tools and techniques to aid in making accurate observations.
It creates a representation of something difficult to see.
what is something that scienists need a microscope to see
Trying to prove something like that will convince her that you dont need him she should notice it by herself.
to beat the russians and or CCCP/USSR in the space race to prove america
So that others can repeat their work and prove (or disprove) its validity.
its because the scientist is a scientist so he need to work hard to invent something not only for the world but also for himself.
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
Galileo
No, and they have tried.
No, you do not need an apostrophe before a scientist's name to show possession. Just add 's after the name to indicate that something belongs to the scientist.
they made inventions to prove that current electricity is there.
To prove that a new organism is a new species, a scientist would need to demonstrate significant differences in key characteristics such as morphology, behavior, genetics, or ecology compared to existing species. Additionally, they would need to show that these differences are consistent and not due to individual variability or environmental factors. Finally, the scientist would need to follow established taxonomic protocols and have their findings peer-reviewed for validation.
louis pasteur