They would have to prove that it is new and unlike any other known organism. Hundreds of measurements, thousands of comparisons, and the opinions of other scientists would be needed to prove anything.
that they are smart
Our species (Homo sapiens) is about 200,000 years old. The neandertal, a species closely related to our own, was about half a million years old. The earliest cave paintings, art work, and evidence of agriculture extend back roughly 20,000 years ago, to the neolithic (new stone age).
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
They didn't adapt to it. They always were in the ocean. In order for someone to claim an adaptation to habitat for a shark species that appears to always have been marine, they would have to prove a prior DIFFERENT habitat. No one has proved such.Ken, the Sharkwrangler
yes. to prove it watch Hidalgo
he didn't have anything to prove
Animalcules are animal cells the where first discovered by the Famous scientist Francesco Red He also did many scientific experiments to prove that spontaneous generation is just a myth.
Galileo
No, and they have tried.
they made inventions to prove that current electricity is there.
Other virus researchers would be likely to try and prove or disprove these theories.
J. Thomson discovered the electron.
of curse science
louis pasteur
J. Thomson discovered the electron.
scientist have not proved this phenomenon.. it is most likely possible but scientist are doing all that they can to prove this..
swag
not only to prove a hypothesis, but disprove it as well