he didn't have anything to prove
It is generally thought to support the Theory of Evolution.
The public, due mostly to religious reasons, was not ready for any transmutational theory and Lamarck's theory had no evidence to support it thus scientists of the time did not pay it much attention. Also Cuvier was Lamarck's enemy and denigrated the theory Lamarck developed.
Morphological evidence.Genetic and genomic evidence.Geographical evidence.
its not a theory its a fact
Individual organisms differ, but some of this variation is heritable. Species alive today are descended with modifications from ancestral species that lived in the distant past.
Arthur Holmes theory was that the mantle under goes thermal convection.
Arthur Holmes' theory of plate tectonics was not proven by a single event or discovery. Instead, it was gradually accepted as more evidence from seafloor spreading, magnetic anomalies, earthquakes, and volcanic activity supported the theory. Holmes' work laid the foundation for the development of the modern theory of plate tectonics.
Arthur Holmes i believe.
The evidence supporting continental drift emerged in the early to mid-20th century, with key contributions from scientists like Alfred Wegener and Arthur Holmes. By the 1960s, advancements in technology, such as ocean floor mapping and paleomagnetism, provided further support for the theory.
Arthur Holmes proposed the theory of continental drift in the early 20th century. He suggested that the continents were once joined together in a supercontinent called "Pangaea" and have since drifted apart due to the movement of the Earth's tectonic plates. Holmes' hypothesis laid the groundwork for the modern theory of plate tectonics.
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
Fossils support his hypothesis.
Many lines of converging evidence.
yes
Personal beliefs and opinions are not a kind of evidence used to support evolutionary theory. Scientific evidence such as fossil records, DNA analysis, and observational data are the main sources of evidence.
Arthur Holmes 1928 theory described plate tectonics and a modern view of the solid Earth. He pioneered the use of radioactive dating of minerals, and understood the mechanical and thermal implications of mantle convection, which was a basis for plate tectonics.
No. There is no scientific evidence to support this theory.