Fossils support his hypothesis.
There is no evidence to support that theory.
The exact year is shrouded in mystery, but there is considerable archaeological evidence to support the theory that the discovery took place almost immediately after life on earth developed eyes.
Albert Einstein supported the theory of evolution and believed in the scientific evidence that supported it.
Theory.
His two main concepts, acquired characteristics and a innate " desire " to evolve, were both unsupported by any evidence and were not the way evolution happens. So, Lamarck's " theory " ( in the vulgar sense ) was utterly refuted by the actual evidence and process of evolution.
yes it does.
There was no evidence to prove it
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
rekmr
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
Many lines of converging evidence.
yes
Personal beliefs and opinions are not a kind of evidence used to support evolutionary theory. Scientific evidence such as fossil records, DNA analysis, and observational data are the main sources of evidence.
A conspiracy theory with no evidence to support it at all.
No. There is no scientific evidence to support this theory.
Yes, because he found fossils from a fresh water lizard, in two different continents separated by salt water.
Many scientists dismissed the theory because it flew in the face of conventional wisdom.