Many scientists dismissed the theory because it flew in the face of conventional wisdom.
The main function of a prosecutor is to represent the government in criminal cases, presenting evidence against individuals accused of committing crimes and working to secure convictions. Prosecutors also have a duty to ensure that justice is served by upholding the law and protecting the rights of victims.
Point evidence explain (PEE) is a writing technique commonly used in essay writing to support and develop an argument. The "point" is the main idea or claim being made, the "evidence" is the supporting information or examples, and the "explain" is where the writer elaborates on how the evidence connects back to the main point. Overall, PEE helps to structure and strengthen an argument by providing clear and logical support for the main claims.
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
Two main pieces of evidence that support Wegner's theory of continental drift are the fit of the continents' coastlines, indicating they were once connected, and the distribution of similar fossils and rock formations across separate continents, suggesting a shared geological history.
One way to support a main idea without using numbers is to provide specific examples, anecdotes, or quotes that illustrate the point being made. By using detailed evidence, you can help make your argument more convincing and engaging for the reader.
1 counterarguement.... there was no drift because all is just as it was created. This theory works under the premise of creationism which disregards all evidence of Evolution OR If you are asking for argument were used against the theory of continental drift; it was rejected because there was no mechanism known that could cause continents to drift. It was revived when the theory of plate tectonics provided this mechanism.
A counterargument is any evidence that undermines an argument. Imagine somebody saying that the UK is the best society - the counter argument would be that it lacks a healthy measure of social mobility or that life chances are still dominated by class origins or that it is too backward looking and not future oriented.
A counterargument is a viewpoint that opposes or goes against the main argument or position presented in a discussion or debate. It is used to challenge the validity of the original argument and highlight potential flaws or alternative perspectives. Counterarguments are important in constructing well-rounded and comprehensive arguments.
The four components to an argument are the claim (the main point or position), evidence (facts or information that support the claim), reasoning (the logic connecting the evidence to the claim), and counterarguments (opposing viewpoints that are addressed).
The four main parts of a persuasive text are the introduction (which includes a hook and a thesis statement), the body (with supporting arguments and evidence), the counterargument/rebuttal (addressing opposing viewpoints), and the conclusion (restating the argument and providing a call to action).
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.
The Exclusionary Rule's purpose is to keep certain evidence from being used against you in a criminal trial. Police procedure in gathering evidence against you is heavily dictated by cases interpreting the Fourth Amendment. Evidence gathered in violation of your Constitutional rights is subject to the Exclusionary Rule.
Paragraph 6 may elaborate on a key point or provide additional supporting evidence to strengthen the author's message in the text. It could serve to clarify a concept, provide examples, or present a counterargument to further develop the author's main idea.
The counterargument segment of a persuasive essay presents information about the opposing viewpoint. This section acknowledges and refutes potential arguments against the main thesis of the essay, demonstrating an understanding of different perspectives before reinforcing the author's stance.
The main evidence presented against the accused witches in Salem village was the raving testimony of young girls. The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts between February 1692, and May 1693. Twenty people, mostly women, were executed.
Spectral Evidence. The afflicted claimed to be able to see the spirits of spectors of the witches and the ghosts of their victims. Of course, that was extremely insubstanial and after it was outlawed, convicts stopped.
Given all the evidence in the story, how do you believe the main character is feeling? Your conclusion will be based on the evidence you have, not on your guesswork. Something about the evidence will lead you to certain feelings on the part of the main character. You will draw a conclusion based on this evidence.