The main evidence presented against the accused witches in Salem village was the raving testimony of young girls. The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts between February 1692, and May 1693. Twenty people, mostly women, were executed.
Evidence presented in court is not retained by the court. After the trial is concluded it is returned to the agency (agencies) that supplied it. If you need access to any of it you will have subpoena the agency to release them. If the case is still on-going (in trial, under appeal, etc), evidence in an ongoing case is never released. Your defense attorney had access to the same material, have you checked with them?
Bj Penn and his camp have accused GSP of both steroid use and of greasing but both claims were not proven
Sparta's declaration of war against Athens began the Peloponnesian war. Sparta accused Athens of breaking their peace and the war began in 431 BCE.
Michelangelo was sent to jail for a year in 1527 for his involvement in a conspiracy against the ruling Medici family in Florence. He was accused of supporting the republican cause and plotting to overthrow the Medici regime. Despite his brief imprisonment, Michelangelo's sentence was eventually commuted, and he was released after a few months.
Martin Luther debated with Johann Eck, a Catholic scholar who disagreed with Luther's theses. He (Eck) originally was going to debate with Carlstadt, one of Luther's friends, however Luther tagged along to the debate and interjected himself into the debate. During this debate, Eck accused Luther of believing in the theories of Jon Hus, an early reformer in Bohemia who was accused of heresy and burned at the stake. Luther eventually admitted that Hus was correct in his theories of following Scripture and going against practices such as Indulgences. Also in the course of the debate, Luther admitted that church Councils and even the Pope could be wrong and that only the Scriptures were correct.
The grand jury reviews the evidence against the accused
Eyewitness accounts. Although most of those people were threatened or tortured into giving false testimony. There wasnt actually any 'evidence' used in the witch trials. Raving testimony of young girls.
During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence such as witness testimonies, physical evidence like DNA or fingerprints, and any relevant documents or records that supported their case against the defendant.
A description that a prosecutor might use when speaking to law enforcement about the quality of the evidence they have presented him with to use at trial. More often used by a defense attorney when trying to cast doubt in the juror's minds about the evidence being presented against their client.
Kenneth Starr.
Lee Harvey Oswald, the only person on Earth that had any physical evidence against him.
If any evidence is acquired without a proper warrant for search and seizure, the evidence must be thrown out before court and the jury cannot use the evidence against the accused in a court case.
In "The Crucible" the evidence that Sarah Good was a witch was that she could not recite the ten commandments. Other evidence presented was that she confessed to witchcraft, and that she mumbled after being refused bread and cider.
The accused has the right to challenge the admissibility of any evidence used against them at trial. Whether an e-mail or any other evidence is "illegally obtained" is subject to the interpretation of the court, not the accused. If the court rules that evidence is obtained unlawfully, it can be suppressed at trial and not considered.
It was necessary to have proper evidence against the accused in court, but the people that made accusations during the McCarthy Era didn't need evidence to accuse others.
All indictments are done in secret. That's why Grand Jury deliberations are not open to the public. The defense gets to see the evidence that will be presented against them during the process of "discovery."
The bloodied knife along with shoe print found at the scene of the crime were found to be corroborating evidence in the trial brought against the suspect.