During the trial, the prosecution presented evidence such as witness testimonies, physical evidence like DNA or fingerprints, and any relevant documents or records that supported their case against the defendant.
They didn't. There may be controversy over this question, but there are only accounts in religious texts indicating this kind of lifespan, and no other kinds of independent evidence in support. Actually, in the Hebrew Scriptures the oldest living person, Methuselah, did not quite reach 1000 years. He is reported to have lived 969 years.
Pisistratus gained the support of the poor, rural people by establishing wise land laws.
Hernán Cortés fooled the Aztecs primarily by exploiting their beliefs and misunderstandings. He and his men presented themselves as gods, particularly by leveraging the legend of Quetzalcoatl, which the Aztecs interpreted as a prophecy of the return of a deity. Additionally, through strategic alliances with rival indigenous groups and showcasing superior weaponry and technology, Cortés was able to gain the trust and support of some Aztec factions, ultimately leading to the fall of the Aztec Empire. His manipulation of diplomacy and psychological tactics played a crucial role in his conquest.
There is no historical evidence to support the claim that Montezuma and the Aztecs believed Cortes was an ancient Aztec god. In fact, Montezuma initially believed Cortes to be a mortal ruler from a distant land. As their interactions continued, Montezuma did show reverence towards Cortes, but this was likely due to various political and strategic motivations rather than a belief in his divinity.
The myth of the "not deer" is a spooky tale that originated from Native American folklore. It is said to be a creature that looks like a deer but is not quite right, with unsettling features or behavior. Some believe it is a warning of danger or death in the woods. However, there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of the not deer, and it is likely just a myth passed down through generations for entertainment or to explain strange occurrences in the wilderness.
Presumably, it is in reference to the evidence that will be, or was, presented in support of the prosecution.
In the process of laying the foundation for a case, evidence such as witness testimony, documents, physical evidence, and expert opinions are presented to support the claims being made. This evidence helps establish the facts and credibility of the case before it is presented in court.
theyre willing to listen to reasonable argument presented with evidence.
The evidence presented in court, such as witness testimony, documents, and physical evidence, supports the claim being made by the party.
Yes, an affidavit can be used as evidence in a court of law. An affidavit is a written statement made under oath, and it is considered a form of evidence that can be presented in court to support a party's case.
Evidence that can support the foundation laid by the keyword in this case may include data, research findings, expert opinions, and examples that demonstrate the relevance and significance of the keyword in the context being discussed.
Maybe. It depends on all the other evidence, both oral and documentary, that is presented.
If it is in a court order, it means that the court did not find that there was sufficient evidence presented to support the allegations, and they are therefore not found to be fact. If it is in a different context, please rephrase and reask.
"Which pieces of evidence directly address the main argument or claim being made?" This question will guide the writer in selecting evidence that is relevant and supportive of the claim being presented.
The final evaluator of forensic evidence is typically the forensic scientist, who analyzes and interprets the evidence to draw conclusions in support of investigations and legal proceedings. Their role is crucial in ensuring that the evidence is accurately interpreted and presented in court.
Citing evidence in an argumentative essay helps support claims by providing credibility to the information presented. It shows that the writer has done research and is using reliable sources to back up their argument. This helps persuade the reader by demonstrating that the claims are based on solid evidence.
Child support guidelines are not mandatory under any circumstances. The amount is dependent on the consider of the evidence presented. see links below