0
1 counterarguement.... there was no drift because all is just as it was created. This theory works under the premise of creationism which disregards all evidence of Evolution
OR
If you are asking for argument were used against the theory of continental drift; it was rejected because there was no mechanism known that could cause continents to drift. It was revived when the theory of plate tectonics provided this mechanism.
What else can I help you with?
Geologists learn about Earths interior using indirect evidence from?
Geologists learn about Earth's interior using indirect evidence from seismic waves, magnetic field data, and rock samples from volcanoes and deep drilling. These methods help provide insights into the composition, structure, and properties of Earth's interior layers.
Which piece of evidence should be used to support each and every argument?
When forming an argument, it is important to use evidence that is relevant, reliable, and directly supports the main claim being made. This may include data, statistics, expert opinions, research studies, and examples that are credible and updated. Additionally, evidence should be used ethically and presented in a clear and logical manner to strengthen the argument being made.
What are elements of argumentation?
Elements of argumentation include a claim (the main point being asserted), evidence (supporting facts or examples), reasoning (explanation of how the evidence supports the claim), and counterarguments (acknowledging and addressing opposing viewpoints). Effective argumentation also includes a clear structure, logical flow, and persuasive language.
What are the four evidences alferd wegener looked at to createhis theory?
Alfred Wegener used four main lines of evidence to support his theory of continental drift: the geometric fit of the continents, matching geological formations across continents, matching fossil distributions across continents, and evidence of past climates from glacial deposits. These pieces of evidence suggested to Wegener that the continents were once joined together in a supercontinent called Pangaea and had since drifted apart.
Is plate tectonics the main lines of evidence are fossils climate clues rock and the theory of seafloor spreading?
Yes, plate tectonics is supported by various lines of evidence such as fossils showing similar species on different continents, climate clues like ancient glaciers in tropical regions, rock formations matching across continents, and the theory of seafloor spreading confirmed by magnetic striping on the ocean floor. These pieces of evidence collectively support the concept of plate tectonics and the movement of Earth's lithosphere.
What was the main counterargument against wegeners evidence?
Many scientists dismissed the theory because it flew in the face of conventional wisdom.
What is a counterargument?
A counterargument is any evidence that undermines an argument. Imagine somebody saying that the UK is the best society - the counter argument would be that it lacks a healthy measure of social mobility or that life chances are still dominated by class origins or that it is too backward looking and not future oriented.
What does counterargument means?
A counterargument is a viewpoint that opposes or goes against the main argument or position presented in a discussion or debate. It is used to challenge the validity of the original argument and highlight potential flaws or alternative perspectives. Counterarguments are important in constructing well-rounded and comprehensive arguments.
What was the major problem with wegners theory of continental drift?
The main problem with Wegners theory of continental drift was that at the time he proposed it he had no real proof.
What are the four components to an argument?
The four components to an argument are the claim (the main point or position), evidence (facts or information that support the claim), reasoning (the logic connecting the evidence to the claim), and counterarguments (opposing viewpoints that are addressed).
What are the four main parts of persuasive text?
The four main parts of a persuasive text are the introduction (which includes a hook and a thesis statement), the body (with supporting arguments and evidence), the counterargument/rebuttal (addressing opposing viewpoints), and the conclusion (restating the argument and providing a call to action).
What is the main purpose of the exclusionary rule?
The Exclusionary Rule's purpose is to keep certain evidence from being used against you in a criminal trial. Police procedure in gathering evidence against you is heavily dictated by cases interpreting the Fourth Amendment. Evidence gathered in violation of your Constitutional rights is subject to the Exclusionary Rule.
How does paragraph 6 contribute to the author's message STA AR Reading?
Paragraph 6 may elaborate on a key point or provide additional supporting evidence to strengthen the author's message in the text. It could serve to clarify a concept, provide examples, or present a counterargument to further develop the author's main idea.
What persuasive essay what segment of the essay presents information about the opposing viewpoint?
The counterargument segment of a persuasive essay presents information about the opposing viewpoint. This section acknowledges and refutes potential arguments against the main thesis of the essay, demonstrating an understanding of different perspectives before reinforcing the author's stance.
What was the main evidence against accused witches in the Salem Witch Trials?
Spectral Evidence. The afflicted claimed to be able to see the spirits of spectors of the witches and the ghosts of their victims. Of course, that was extremely insubstanial and after it was outlawed, convicts stopped.
Thee main evidence presented against the accused witches in Salem Villiage was the?
The main evidence presented against the accused witches in Salem village was the raving testimony of young girls. The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts between February 1692, and May 1693. Twenty people, mostly women, were executed.
What does draw a conclusion about how the main character feels mean?
Given all the evidence in the story, how do you believe the main character is feeling? Your conclusion will be based on the evidence you have, not on your guesswork. Something about the evidence will lead you to certain feelings on the part of the main character. You will draw a conclusion based on this evidence.
