0
two ways I know of: contemplation, observation
1. if you see lights come on and go off when someone touches something on the wall, you might hypothesize a relation between the action and effect
2. lacking observation, some brilliant people apply all that they know about an issue and "jump" to a conclusion ie a hypothesis. One example might be by knowing the established relation F=ma (force = mass times acceleration). One might hypothesize that a similar relation might hold for energy (and it does, Einstein's E=mc^2 energy=mass Times Square of a velocity )
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoa.using informed creative imGINtion
b.using logical infernce
c. prior knowlodge
d. using a feeling about what should occur
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do scientists form and test?
hypotheses
What can scientists build to test their hypotheses?
models
What is a way that scientist generate hypotheses?
An observable explanation, that can be tested.
Scientists use tools to?
...prove hypotheses, for one.
What is an excellent tool to gauge the reliability of any theory is its capacity to generate correct?
hypotheses
What do scientists form and test?
hypotheses
How scientists test hypothheses?
To test hypotheses, scientists create experiments.
What can scientists build to test their hypotheses?
models
What is a way that scientist generate hypotheses?
An observable explanation, that can be tested.
Scientists use tools to?
...prove hypotheses, for one.
What do scientists do when their hypotheses are correct?
They will celebrate and tell the world how awesome they are.
What is an excellent tool to gauge the reliability of any theory is its capacity to generate correct?
hypotheses
What do scientists attempt to confirm by testing one hypotheses?
preditions x)
Is it true that the scientific attitude of skepticism helps scientists come up with good experiments to test hypotheses?
The scientific attitude of skepticism helps scientists come up with good experiments to test hypotheses
What do scientists do when experiments show their hypotheses to be incorrect?
Hopefully the publish their negative results.
What are the scientific steps in solving a problem?
There are five main scientific steps in solving a problem. They are observing, forming hypotheses, testing hypotheses, analyzing data, and evaluating results. During the observing process, scientists make observations and examine prior research. While forming a hypothesis or hypotheses (plural form) scientists ask questions and try to explain the observations. In the process of testing the hypotheses. scientists collect data that they use to support or reject a hypothesis. Analyzing data is when scientists analyze their data to draw conclusions about their research. finally evaluating results, scientists evaluate the data and conclusions presented by other scientists. This a cycle that keeps going on and on.
Why do scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become?
Scientists encourage other scientists so that all scientists can get the most accurate answer to all questions
